Irina: How do you swap deals with other angel groups? By e-mail?
Corey: That was how it was done years ago, and it’s still done that way, sometimes but there’s a Web platform called AngelSoft, and that makes it really easy. There are features right inside AngelSoft, so we can just send deals right through the AngelSoft system to any group that uses it. That makes it easy.
Irina Patterson and Candice Arnold have posted a series of interview segments with Corey Silva of River Valley Investors. Corey answers a wide range of questions from how he got his start to the ins-and-outs of how RVI operates and invests.
While we appreciate Corey’s kind words about Angelsoft in the fourth segment, the 13-part series gives an excellent overview of the angel investment process.
Entrepreneurs will find it to be a helpful orientation to what goes on behind the curtain. Investors will find an interesting story of Corey’s path from Rock n’ Roll musician to manager of the River Valley Investors angel group along with a great reference point for managing an angel investor group.
For those new to early stage venture investment, syndication is when multiple investor groups (VCs or angels) contribute funds to a cumulatively larger investment sum in a single company. Syndication is an opportunity to spread risk, combine resources, and collaborate with strategic partners in other regions.
Venture Hype has published the first post of a 2-part interview with Paul G. Silva regarding “Angel Group Syndication Process Design.”
Silva emphasized the importance of unified collaboration. The groups used Angelsoft to coordinate their combined due diligence efforts:
Unite ALL interested investors from all groups into 1 due diligence team, all sharing 1 set of tools. In our case we all used AngelSoft’s Co-invest feature to make sure everyone was on the same mailing lists and looking at the same documentation.
Thomas Korte wrote a compelling blog post about a recent angel investment he made in under 3 hours.
Thomas notes, “It’s important to point out that such a turnaround is highly unusual, even for me. It is more common to take weeks, sometimes months before investing in a company.”
We were glad to hear how Angelsoft played a supporting role in his decision:
Another important fact was that all of the documents were well prepared and easily accessible. David gave me access to his “deal room” on Angelsoft (think salesforce for angel investors) and I could quickly understand what they do, what their plans are, and what traction they already gained.
Within Angelsoft I could also read the conversations other investors had with Ryan and see who else was investing. Using Angelsoft made the process of funding SetJam much easier and faster.
There they gave a great 30 minute presentation about how prospective angels should find deals, work with portfolio companies, and approach angel investing in general (I won’t spoil their grand finale, but suffice it to say that the last five minutes of their presentation should be mandatory viewing for every past, present and future angel investor on a monthly basis.)
But don’t take my word for it, listen for yourself:
Roger Ehrenberg, one of the smartest and most active angel investors in New York (and a member of Angelsoft-based New York Angels) recently led a $1.25 million angel financing of Domdex, an exciting new company in the Internet marketing space. In this interview from the DailyDeal with Mary Kathleen Flynn, Roger discusses the new breed of serious angels, and why they can be a viable alternative to traditional venture financing. Disclosure: I was one of the angels who participated in this round.
A great write-up of the sage (and virtually unanimous) advice from the participants has been posted on VentureBlog by August Capital’s David Hornik (host of the annual Lobby conference.) Here’s the distilled summary of his summary:
It’s a small community — if you screw one entrepreneur, you’ll be out of the angel business because entrepreneurs talk (Conway)
Angel investing is about learning on the job, which means that you can plan on screwing up your first 10 deals at least (McClure)
If you assume that the money is gone once you’ve invested it — that it is like a lottery ticket — then you will have a better time angel investing (Buchheit)
Work with other angel investors so that you can get the advantage of their expertise (Zurich)
There is no rational way to arrive at valuation, so don’t be overly concerned about getting it right (Graham)
Don’t worry if the idea seems crazy — if it didn’t seem crazy, it would be too late to invest as an angel (Graham)
The lifeblood of angel investors is deal flow — you need huge deal flow to find enough stuff that is worth investing in (Ravikant)
The best deals come from other angels(Ravikant)
Don’t be afraid to throw a little dynamite into the status quo and see what comes out of it — often times interesting stuff emerges (and sometimes nothing does) (Dearing)
The Rule of 12 — you need to invest in 12 companies to have statistical diversity — invest in fewer than 12 deals and you run the risk of them all failing (Maples)
Like in the movie “Oceans 11,” you want to pull together the best team of angel specialists there are out there — it increases the likelihood that the company will succeed (Maples)
Help bring your entrepreneurs together so that they can learn from one another (Poler)
By being a connector, you will see the most interesting stuff and work with the most interesting people (Senkut)
Angel investing is all about the syndicate — you can lead if you want to but it can be lonely until others join in the syndicate (Clavier)
Angel investors need to distinguish themselves from others with money – what do you bring to the table? Contacts. Experience. Advice. (Young)
Only invest in stuff you actually know something about — otherwise you’re just buying a lottery ticket (Young)
This is an overview of all the tools on the “My Groups” tab. It covers the Deal list, Group Document Vault, Group Messages, Events, and Member tabs.
2) Deal Tools:
A basic overview of the tools we provide on the deal level. Each deal has a dashboard, documents vault, message forum, and a deal history tab. This video will give you a quick tour.
3) Investor Community:
An introduction to the last of the top level tabs, the Community. Definitely the place to start if you’re looking to find deals or to find new co-investors from the Angelsoft investor community at large.
Recently, Scott Shane, a very smart and decent guy who is a professor of Entrepreneurial Studies at Case Western Reserve, has been highly visible around the web blogging and commentating in support of his recently published book, Fool’s Gold: The Truth Behind Angel Investing in America.
His main thesis is that ‘people’ have a very misleading view of that rare creature known as an “angel investor”, and that angels are far less numerous, generous, and active than ‘everyone’ thinks. In support of this he has extensively research the subject, pulling together all of the available statistics on the field, from the Angel Capital Association, the Center for Venture Research, and even us at Angelsoft (which we’ve been happy to provide.)
As I read his book, and many of his subsequent blog postings and commentaries, I am alternately baffled, bothered and bewildered by his conclusions. First, let me say that his research is legitimate and (as far as anyone, including me, can tell) accurate. So I am not disputing his facts. What I object to, however, is that he sets up straw men to demolish, in order to make lurid points that I believe lead his readers to draw inaccurate conclusions on the state of angel investing.
Take, for example, his contention that angels in America invested “only” as much money last year as venture capital firms. Is the fact of “angel investments = vc investments” accurate? Yes (to the best of our knowledge.) But phrasing it as “only as much” somehow implies that someone is maintaining it is much more. Hunh?
What we and the facts all agree on, is that LAST YEAR ANGELS INVESTED $26 BILLION IN US COMPANIES!! Who on earth is claiming it is anything higher than that??
Meanwhile, in a recent blog post on Small Business Trends, Scott opines that so-called “active investors” are a myth, because even among the cream-of-the-crop angels, the self-reported average time they spend with their portfolio companies is a miniscule 41.9 minutes a week [gasp!] Once again, I can confirm his facts, but substantively disagree with his conclusions!
I’m one of his “cream of the crop” active angel investors. I’m the Chairman of New York Angels (one of the largest and most active angel groups in the country, with 22 deals this year alone), have 70+ companies in my personal portfolio, and spend my full business time on angel-related activities. That said, it would be absolutely correct to say that there are some (indeed, many) ventures in which I have invested on which I spend less than 41.9 minutes per week. And the problem with that is??
I’m not running the business, the entrepreneur is! The last thing he or she wants is me looking over his or her shoulder and micro-managing the company. If that’s what I need to do, then I shouldn’t have invested in this venture in the first place.
Think about it this way: if, after pulling together an investment round of half a million dollars for a company (including corralling the investors, structuring the deal terms, and doing due diligence analysis, all for no compensation, and then investing $100,000 of my own money), I followed through by serving on the company’s Board of Directors (which would be active involvement indeed), kept updated by asking for and reading weekly management reports (which is way more than most CEOs want to provide), referred the CEO to a dozen high-level sales and business development prospects from my network during the year, and then introduced them to five top-tier venture capital firms for potential participation in a follow-on investment round…would that be the kind of “active” angel investor you’d like to have?
I think the answer from any entrepreneur I’ve ever met would be “yes, in a heartbeat!”
Now, let’s look at my time involvement post closing:
You can create a deal in Angelsoft by sending or forwarding an email to your drop-box email (newsubmissions@YourGroupName.angelgroups.net ).
Remember these simple rules to maximize your use of the drop-box email:
The subject of the message will be the Deal Name.
The files attached to the email (up to 10MB) will go in Documents.
The body of the message will be posted under Messages.
This will speed things up, and allow you to start tracking ALL your deals in Angelsoft.
For a more advanced option, you can also add ::referral source to the subject line, to indicate the person or organization who referred the entrepreneur to you. For instance, if a company named ABC General was introduced to you by Sam Smith, then the subject line should be: ABC General::Sam Smith.
Angel investor groups have a reputation of being extremely guarded about their activities. As most of you know, we’ve spent the last 4 years helping to make the activity of this hugely valuable sector of our economy more transparent. As part of these efforts, we’re building Group Profiles for all of our 450 angel investor groups to help them network more effectively and to help entrepreneurs make intelligent choices about whom to apply to.
You can see our current wireframe below:
If you take a close look at the screenshot (click on it and expand it to full-size), you can see that we’re encouraging our angel investor groups expose some very sensitive information about themselves. Obviously, our highest priority has ALWAYS been to protect our groups, so we decided to send them a survey to get a sense of how open they were to this idea. The survey asked if they would be willing to show this information and if so how valuable it would be to their members, prospective investor partners, and to entrepreneurs.
The response was somewhat surprising: An overwhelming number of our groups thought this information would be valuable not only to their investors and fellow group managers, but ALSO to entrepreneurs. I’ve linked to the original survey and the response details, but combining the response, you get numbers like these:
Of the 60 angel investment groups that replied, a staggering 62% felt that even the most sensitive data would be valuable to entrepreneurs and only 19% wanted to hide this information from them. If you discount the 4% that didn’t even want to share this information with their own membership, only 15% wanted to keep this information specifically from entrepreneurs.
Obviously there is now a raging debate here about how accurate the survey is, so we’d like you to chime in. Are angel investment groups realizing the value of transparency, or are these results meaningless? We’re obviously hoping for the sake of the angel industry that it’s the prior!
We’re sending out the survey to our entrepreneur community tomorrow and will post those results then.
